John McGhee v. US

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for hearing en banc (FRAP 35) [999146576-2]. Originating case number: 5:09-ct-03192-BO. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999156500]. Mailed to: John McGhee. [13-6514]

Appeal: 13-6514

Doc: 14

Filed: 07/23/2013

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-6514

JOHN MCGHEE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS; BRYAN MOON; M. LEE; G. ORTIZ;
ROBIN HUNTER-BUSKER; NURSE SCOTT,
Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (5:09-ct-03192-BO)

Submitted:

July 18, 2013

Decided:

July 23, 2013

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John McGhee, Appellant Pro Se.
Kelley,
BUREAU
OF
PRISONS,
Appellees.

David T. Huband, Christina Ann
Butner,
North
Carolina,
for

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 13-6514

Doc: 14

Filed: 07/23/2013

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
John McGhee appeals the district court’s order denying
relief

on

his

complaint

filed

pursuant

to

the

Federal

Tort

Claims Act, 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 1346(b)(1), 2671-2680 (West 2006 &
Supp. 2013).
error.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court.
(E.D.N.C.

Mar.

requested

a

Accordingly,

McGhee v. United States, No. 5:09-ct-03192-BO
26,

poll
the

2013).
on

No

McGhee’s

motion

is

judge
motion

denied.

of
for
We

the
en

en

banc

banc

dispense

court

hearing.
with

oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2