Christopher Lane v. Dennis Patterson

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 0:11-cv-03278-RBH Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999132041]. Mailed to: Christopher Lane. [13-6571]

Download PDF
Appeal: 13-6571 Doc: 15 Filed: 06/18/2013 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-6571 CHRISTOPHER LANE, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. DENNIS PATTERSON, DDO; WAYNE MCCABE, Warden; TRAVIS GUESS, Sergeant, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (0:11-cv-03278-RBH) Submitted: June 13, 2013 Decided: June 18, 2013 Before NIEMEYER, KING, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Christopher Lane, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher Thomas Dorsel, Sandra J. Senn, SENN LEGAL, LLC, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 13-6571 Doc: 15 Filed: 06/18/2013 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Christopher Lane appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. reviewed the record and find no reversible error. We have Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lane v. Patterson, No. 0:11-cv-03278-RBH (D.S.C. Mar. 22, 2013). dispense with contentions are oral argument adequately because presented in the the facts We and legal materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?