Christopher Lane v. Dennis Patterson
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 0:11-cv-03278-RBH Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999132041]. Mailed to: Christopher Lane. [13-6571]
Appeal: 13-6571
Doc: 15
Filed: 06/18/2013
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-6571
CHRISTOPHER LANE,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
DENNIS PATTERSON, DDO; WAYNE MCCABE, Warden; TRAVIS GUESS,
Sergeant,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Rock Hill. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge.
(0:11-cv-03278-RBH)
Submitted:
June 13, 2013
Decided:
June 18, 2013
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Christopher Lane, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher Thomas Dorsel,
Sandra J. Senn, SENN LEGAL, LLC, Charleston, South Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 13-6571
Doc: 15
Filed: 06/18/2013
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Christopher
Lane
appeals
the
district
court’s
order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief
on
his
42
U.S.C.
§ 1983
(2006)
complaint.
reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
We
have
Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Lane v.
Patterson, No. 0:11-cv-03278-RBH (D.S.C. Mar. 22, 2013).
dispense
with
contentions
are
oral
argument
adequately
because
presented
in
the
the
facts
We
and
legal
materials
before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?