Gregory Smith v. P. Spivey

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999187003-2] Originating case number: 1:12-cv-00029-RBH Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999236728]. Mailed to: Gregory Smith. [13-6586]

Appeal: 13-6586

Doc: 20

Filed: 11/08/2013

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-6586

GREGORY V. SMITH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
P. E. SPIVEY, Jail Director, Individual and Official
capacity; CHRIS PHILLIPS, Detective, Individual and Official
capacity,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Aiken.
R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge.
(1:12-cv-00029-RBH)

Submitted:

October 28, 2013

Decided:

November 8, 2013

Before AGEE, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gregory V. Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel C. Plyler, DAVIDSON
& LINDEMANN, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 13-6586

Doc: 20

Filed: 11/08/2013

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Gregory V. Smith appeals the district court’s orders
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint and denying his
motion for reconsideration.

We have reviewed the record and the

district

and

court’s

orders

find

no

reversible

error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court.

Smith v. Spivey, No. 1:12-cv-00029-RBH (D.S.C. Feb. 27 &

Apr. 15, 2013).
and dispense
contentions

We deny the motion for appointment of counsel

with
are

oral

argument

adequately

because

presented

in

the

facts

and

the

materials

legal
before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2