Raheem Rahman v. J. Stouffer

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:11-cv-03497-WMN Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999177119]. Mailed to: Raheem Rahman. [13-6627]

Appeal: 13-6627

Doc: 11

Filed: 08/21/2013

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-6627

RAHEEM RAHMAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
J. MICHAEL STOUFFER, Commissioner; BOBBY SHEARIN, Warden;
LIEUTENANT DOLLY; SERGEANT WHITACRE; OFFICER HOOVER; GARY
MAYNARD, Secretary; DR. GREGORY TAYLOR,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
William M. Nickerson, Senior District
Judge. (1:11-cv-03497-WMN)

Submitted:

August 7, 2013

Before AGEE and
Circuit Judge.

FLOYD,

Decided:

Circuit

Judges,

and

August 21, 2013

HAMILTON,

Senior

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Raheem Rahman, Appellant Pro Se. Nancy P. Tennis, OFFICE OF THE
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland; Michelle
Jacquelyn Marzullo, MARKS, O’NEILL, O’BRIEN, DOHERTY & KELLY,
P.C., Towson, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 13-6627

Doc: 11

Filed: 08/21/2013

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Raheem

Rahman

appeals

the

district

court’s

orders

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint and
denying

his

motion

under

Fed.

R.

Civ.

P.

59(e).

reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

We

have

Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

Rahman

v. Stouffer, No. 1:11-cv-03497-WMN (D. Md. Mar. 12, 2013; Apr.
22, 2013).
legal
before

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

contentions
this

court

are

adequately

and

argument

presented

would

not

in
aid

the
the

materials
decisional

process.
AFFIRMED

2