US v. Chester Barnes, Jr.

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:07-cr-00351-BO-1. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999131981]. Mailed to: Chester Barnes, Jr. [13-6681]

Download PDF
Appeal: 13-6681 Doc: 8 Filed: 06/18/2013 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-6681 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. CHESTER LEE BARNES, JR., Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:07-cr-00351-BO-1) Submitted: June 13, 2013 Decided: June 18, 2013 Before NIEMEYER, KING, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Chester Lee Barnes, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer P. MayParker, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 13-6681 Doc: 8 Filed: 06/18/2013 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Chester Lee Barnes appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction in his sentence based Guidelines Manual. on amendments to the U.S. Sentencing We conclude that the district court properly determined that Barnes was ineligible for a sentence reduction because his sentencing range was determined by his career offender designation, not the drug quantities attributable to him, and thus was not impacted by the amendments. States v. Munn, 595 F.3d 183, 187 (4th Cir. 2010). we affirm the district court’s order. United Accordingly, We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?