US v. Everton Bartley
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:00-cr-00210-FDW-4 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999204277]. Mailed to: Everton Bartley. [13-6689]
Appeal: 13-6689
Doc: 9
Filed: 09/30/2013
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-6689
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
EVERTON
John,
BARTLEY,
a/k/a
Frederick
Alexander
Martin,
a/k/a
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte.
Frank D. Whitney,
Chief District Judge. (3:00-cr-00210-FDW-4)
Submitted:
September 26, 2013
Decided:
September 30, 2013
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Everton Bartley, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant
United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 13-6689
Doc: 9
Filed: 09/30/2013
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Everton
Bartley
appeals
the
district
court’s
order
denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for sentence
reduction.
error.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court.
United States v. Bartley, No. 3:00-cr-00210-
FDW-4 (W.D.N.C. Sept. 14, 2012).
We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?