Tony Belton v. Dr. Joel Sexton

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999127596-2] Originating case number: 1:13-cv-00389-DCN Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999181157]. Mailed to: Belton. [13-6704]

Download PDF
Appeal: 13-6704 Doc: 10 Filed: 08/27/2013 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-6704 TONY LEE BELTON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DR JOEL SEXTON; DR JANICE ROSS; MARGARET HINDS, Esquire; THOMAS SCOTT, III, Esquire, are all being sued in their individual and official capacity, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken. David C. Norton, District Judge. (1:13-cv-00389-DCN) Submitted: August 22, 2013 Decided: August 27, 2013 Before MOTZ, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Tony Lee Belton, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 13-6704 Doc: 10 Filed: 08/27/2013 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Tony Lee Belton appeals the district court’s order accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to dismiss his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action against Defendants after a 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (2006) appointment of counsel. reversible error. review, and has filed a motion for We have reviewed the record and find no Accordingly, we deny Belton’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm the district court’s judgment. Belton v. Sexton, No. 1:13-cv-00389-DCN (D.S.C. filed Apr. 15, 2013; entered Apr. 16, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?