Robert Mitchell v. Warden of Broad River
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying for certificate of appealability Originating case number: 4:13-cv-00470-CMC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999161755]. Mailed to: Mitchell. [13-6816]
Appeal: 13-6816
Doc: 5
Filed: 07/30/2013
Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-6816
ROBERT L. MITCHELL, a/k/a Robert Lee Mitchell, a/k/a Robert
Mitchell,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
WARDEN OF BROAD RIVER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION,
Respondent - Appellee,
and
BILL BYARS, Director SC Dept of Corrections,
Respondent.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence.
Cameron McGowan Currie, District
Judge. (4:13-cv-00470-CMC)
Submitted:
July 25, 2013
Decided:
July 30, 2013
Before GREGORY, DAVIS, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert L. Mitchell, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 13-6816
Doc: 5
Filed: 07/30/2013
Pg: 2 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Robert
court’s
order
L.
dismissing
(2006) petition.
magistrate
Mitchell
as
be
timely
and
to
appeal
successive
his
28
the
district
U.S.C.
§ 2254
The district court referred this case to a
judge
pursuant
(West 2006 & Supp. 2013).
relief
seeks
denied
and
specific
to
28
U.S.C.A.
§ 636(b)(1)(B)
The magistrate judge recommended that
advised
Mitchell
objections
to
that
this
failure
to
recommendation
file
could
waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the
recommendation.
The
magistrate
timely
judge’s
filing
of
specific
recommendation
is
objections
necessary
to
to
a
preserve
appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when
the
parties
have
been
warned
of
the
consequences
of
noncompliance.
Diamond v. Colonial Life & Accident Ins. Co.,
416
315-16
F.3d
766 F.2d
310,
841,
845-46
(4th
(4th
Cir.
Cir.
2005);
1985).
Wright
v.
Mitchell
Collins,
has
waived
appellate review of the district court’s order by failing to
file objections to the magistrate judge’s recommendation after
receiving proper notice.
Accordingly, we deny a certificate of
appealability and dismiss the appeal.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal
contentions
are
adequately
2
presented
in
the
materials
Appeal: 13-6816
before
Doc: 5
this
Filed: 07/30/2013
court
and
Pg: 3 of 3
argument
would
not
aid
the
decisional
process.
DISMISSED
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?