Jeffery Porter v. Tanja Korpri
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:13-cv-00026-RGD-TEM Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999181129]. Mailed to: Porter. [13-6822]
Appeal: 13-6822
Doc: 10
Filed: 08/27/2013
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-6822
JEFFERY EDWARD PORTER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
TANJA M. KORPRI,
Attorney at Law,
Assistant
Prosecutor;
EMILY
M.
MUNN,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk.
Robert G. Doumar, Senior
District Judge. (2:13-cv-00026-RGD-TEM)
Submitted:
August 22, 2013
Decided:
August 27, 2013
Before MOTZ, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jeffery Edward Porter, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 13-6822
Doc: 10
Filed: 08/27/2013
Pg: 2 of 2
Edward
appeals
PER CURIAM:
Jeffery
Porter
the
district
court’s
order dismissing his civil rights action for failure to state a
claim.
See
28
U.S.C.
confine
our
brief.
See 4th Cir. R. 34(b).
does
not
legal
before
Porter
order.
judgment.
to
challenge
disposition,
court’s
review
§ 1915A(b)(1)
the
the
has
issues
raised
On
in
the
appeal,
we
Appellant’s
Because Porter’s informal brief
basis
for
forfeited
Accordingly,
(2006).
we
the
district
appellate
affirm
the
court’s
review
of
district
the
court’s
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
contentions
this
court
are
adequately
and
argument
presented
would
not
in
aid
the
the
materials
decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?