Jeffery Porter v. Tanja Korpri

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:13-cv-00026-RGD-TEM Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999181129]. Mailed to: Porter. [13-6822]

Download PDF
Appeal: 13-6822 Doc: 10 Filed: 08/27/2013 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-6822 JEFFERY EDWARD PORTER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. TANJA M. KORPRI, Attorney at Law, Assistant Prosecutor; EMILY M. MUNN, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (2:13-cv-00026-RGD-TEM) Submitted: August 22, 2013 Decided: August 27, 2013 Before MOTZ, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jeffery Edward Porter, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 13-6822 Doc: 10 Filed: 08/27/2013 Pg: 2 of 2 Edward appeals PER CURIAM: Jeffery Porter the district court’s order dismissing his civil rights action for failure to state a claim. See 28 U.S.C. confine our brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). does not legal before Porter order. judgment. to challenge disposition, court’s review § 1915A(b)(1) the the has issues raised On in the appeal, we Appellant’s Because Porter’s informal brief basis for forfeited Accordingly, (2006). we the district appellate affirm the court’s review of district the court’s We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions this court are adequately and argument presented would not in aid the the materials decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?