Elbert Simpkins v. Al Cannon

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for transcript at government expense [999131473-2] Originating case number: 5:12-cv-01447-GRA Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999204308]. Mailed to: Elbert Simpkins. [13-6904]

Download PDF
Appeal: 13-6904 Doc: 12 Filed: 09/30/2013 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-6904 ELBERT SIMPKINS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SHERIFF AL CANNON; CAPTAIN KEYS; NFN RANDALL; LT JOHNSON, classification dept; CO NFN LOVE; CO NFN VEGAS, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Orangeburg. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:12-cv-01447-GRA) Submitted: September 26, 2013 Decided: September 30, 2013 Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Elbert Simpkins, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher Thomas Dorsel, Sandra J. Senn, SENN LEGAL, LLC, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 13-6904 Doc: 12 Filed: 09/30/2013 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Elbert Simpkins appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. reviewed the record and find no reversible error. We have Accordingly, we deny Simpkins’ motion for a transcript at government expense and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Simpkins v. Cannon, No. 5:12-cv-01447-GRA (D.S.C. May 28, 2013). We dispense contentions with are oral argument adequately because presented in the facts and the materials legal before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?