Elbert Simpkins v. Al Cannon
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for transcript at government expense [999131473-2] Originating case number: 5:12-cv-01447-GRA Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999204308]. Mailed to: Elbert Simpkins. [13-6904]
Appeal: 13-6904
Doc: 12
Filed: 09/30/2013
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-6904
ELBERT SIMPKINS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SHERIFF AL CANNON; CAPTAIN KEYS; NFN RANDALL; LT JOHNSON,
classification dept; CO NFN LOVE; CO NFN VEGAS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Orangeburg.
G. Ross Anderson, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (5:12-cv-01447-GRA)
Submitted:
September 26, 2013
Decided:
September 30, 2013
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Elbert Simpkins, Appellant Pro Se.
Christopher Thomas Dorsel,
Sandra J. Senn, SENN LEGAL, LLC, Charleston, South Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 13-6904
Doc: 12
Filed: 09/30/2013
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Elbert
Simpkins
appeals
the
district
court’s
order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief
on
his
42
U.S.C.
§ 1983
(2006)
complaint.
reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
We
have
Accordingly,
we deny Simpkins’ motion for a transcript at government expense
and
affirm
for
the
reasons
stated
by
the
district
court.
Simpkins v. Cannon, No. 5:12-cv-01447-GRA (D.S.C. May 28, 2013).
We
dispense
contentions
with
are
oral
argument
adequately
because
presented
in
the
facts
and
the
materials
legal
before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?