Rayvern Green v. Warden McCall

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 6:13-cv-00503-JMC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999161794]. Mailed to: Green. [13-6918]

Appeal: 13-6918

Doc: 6

Filed: 07/30/2013

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-6918

RAYVERN EARL GREEN, formerly inmate 340900,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WARDEN M. MCCALL,
Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Greenville.
J. Michelle Childs, District
Judge. (6:13-cv-00503-JMC)

Submitted:

July 25, 2013

Decided:

July 30, 2013

Before GREGORY, DAVIS, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rayvern Earl Green, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 13-6918

Doc: 6

Filed: 07/30/2013

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Rayvern
court’s

order

failing

to

prosecute.

Earl

Green

dismissing

comply

with

his

seeks

to

complaint

orders

of

the

appeal
without
court

the

district

prejudice

and

failing

for
to

This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final

orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and
collateral

orders,

28

U.S.C.

§ 1292

(2006);

Fed.

R.

Civ.

P.

54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 54546 (1949).
order

nor

The order Green seeks to appeal is neither a final
an

appealable

interlocutory

or

collateral

order.

Green may be able to reopen his case by filing a motion in the
district court and complying with the court’s order.

Domino

Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064,
1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993).
lack of jurisdiction.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for
We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials

before

this

court

and

argument

would

not

aid

the

decisional process.

DISMISSED

2