Kevin Razzoli v. Middle District Court Clerk

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999141209-2] Originating case number: 2:08-cv-00057-JPB-JES Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999246576]. Mailed to: Kevin Razzoli. [13-6988]

Appeal: 13-6988

Doc: 12

Filed: 11/25/2013

Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-6988

KEVIN RAZZOLI,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
MIDDLE DISTRICT COURT CLERK, (MD.Pa.); WARDEN FCI GILMER,
(Nominal); PRESIDENT G. W. BUSH; ATTORNEY GENERAL MICHAEL B.
MUKASEY; PAST ATTORNEY GENERAL(S), (Known & Unknown);
SECRETARY OF THE NAVY, (Present); SECRETARY OF NAVY ENGLAND,
(Past); FIVE US PAROLE COMMISSIONER'S; PSYCHOLOGY DEPT.
B.O.P. & C.I.A.; US ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, (Executive Branch);
NAVAL INVESTIGATION SERVICE; ROBERT MUELLER, Federal Bureau
of Investigation Dir.; UNKNOWN STATE & LOCAL NEW JERSEY, NEW
YORK,
PENNSYLVANIA,
Law
Enforcement
Agencies;
UNKNOWN
FEDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT & INTELLIGENCE, Agency(s),
Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Elkins.
John Preston Bailey,
Chief District Judge. (2:08-cv-00057-JPB-JES)

Submitted:

November 21, 2013

Decided:

Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kevin Razzoli, Appellant Pro Se.

November 25, 2013

Appeal: 13-6988

Doc: 12

Filed: 11/25/2013

Pg: 2 of 3

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 13-6988

Doc: 12

Filed: 11/25/2013

Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
Kevin

Razzoli,

a

federal

prisoner,

appeals

the

district court’s orders denying his Rule 60(b) motion to reopen
his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp. 2013) petition and
denying reconsideration.
no reversible error.

We have reviewed the record and find

Accordingly, although we grant leave to

proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court.

Razzoli v. Middle Dist. Court Clerk, No.

2:08-cv-00057-JPB-JES (N.D. W. Va. May 28 & June 12, 2013).
dispense

with

contentions

are

oral

argument

adequately

because

presented

in

the
the

facts

We

and

legal

materials

before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3