US v. Arthur Outlaw

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 4:00-cr-70114-JLK-RSB-1. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999204262]. Mailed to: Arthur Outlaw. [13-6999]

Appeal: 13-6999

Doc: 5

Filed: 09/30/2013

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-6999

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ARTHUR OUTLAW, a/k/a Ace, a/k/a Aceyon Rogers,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Danville.
Jackson L. Kiser, Senior
District Judge. (4:00-cr-70114-JLK-RSB-1)

Submitted:

September 26, 2013

Decided:

September 30, 2013

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Arthur Alan Outlaw, Appellant Pro Se.
Donald Ray Wolthuis,
Assistant
United
States
Attorney,
Roanoke,
Virginia,
for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 13-6999

Doc: 5

Filed: 09/30/2013

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Arthur Alan Outlaw appeals the district court’s order
denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a sentence
reduction.
error.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. ∗

United States v. Outlaw, No. 4:00-cr-70114-JLK-

RSB-1 (W.D. Va. June 10, 2013).

We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

∗

We further note that 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) is not the
appropriate mechanism to assert the retroactive application of
Alleyne v. United States, 133 S. Ct. 2151 (2013).

2