Stuart Tompkins v. Joel Herron

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for injunctive relief pending appeal (FRAP 8) [999219578-2], denying Motion for injunctive relief pending appeal (FRAP 8) [999210063-2] Originating case number: 1:10-cv-00978-TDS-LPA Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999221932]. Mailed to: appellant. [13-7024]

Appeal: 13-7024

Doc: 31

Filed: 10/21/2013

Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-7024

STUART WAYNE TOMPKINS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JOEL
HERRON,
Correctional
Administrator;
KRISTIE
B.
STANBACK, Assistant Superintendent; GERALDINE O. LEWIS; JOHN
DOE LOWERY, Sergant Over Mailroom; JOHN DOE INGRAM, Mailroom
Staff; JANE DOE NORTON, Mailroom Staff; JANE DOE NORRIS,
Mailroom Staff; ROBERT C. LEWIS, Director of Prison; ALVIN
WILLIAM KELLER, JR., Secretary of Correction; BEVERLY EAVES
PERDUE, Governor's; JAMES C. FRYE, Program Manager; JOHN DOE
COVINGTON, Unit Manager; JANE DOE ALFORD, Assistant Unit
Manager;
MARRIETTA
BARR,
Ex-Assistant
Manager
(Now
Lieutenant); CHANDRA K. RANSOM, a/k/a Jane Doe, Ex-Unit
Manager,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Thomas D. Schroeder,
District Judge. (1:10-cv-00978-TDS-LPA)

Submitted:

October 17, 2013

Decided: October 21, 2013

Before AGEE, DAVIS, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Appeal: 13-7024

Doc: 31

Filed: 10/21/2013

Pg: 2 of 3

Stuart Wayne Tompkins, Appellant Pro Se.
Assistant
Attorney
General,
Raleigh,
Appellees.

Peter Andrew Regulski,
North
Carolina,
for

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 13-7024

Doc: 31

Filed: 10/21/2013

Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
Stuart

Wayne

Tompkins

appeals

the

district

court’s

text order denying relief on post-judgment motions filed in his
42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action.
find

no

reversible

error.

We have reviewed the record and
Accordingly,

reasons stated by the district court.
1:10-cv-00978-TDS-LPA
motion

and

supplemental

appeal are denied.
facts

and

materials

(M.D.N.C.

legal
before

motion

June
for

we

affirm

for

the

Tompkins v. Herron, No.
18,

2013).

injunctive

Tompkins’

relief

pending

We dispense with oral argument because the

contentions

are

adequately

this

and

argument

court

presented

would

not

in

the

aid

the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3