US v. David Sanjurjo

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:98-cr-00338-REP-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999203334].. [13-7037]

Appeal: 13-7037

Doc: 6

Filed: 09/27/2013

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-7037

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
DAVID SANJURJO, a/k/a Mickey,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond.
Robert E. Payne, Senior
District Judge. (3:98-cr-00338-REP-1)

Submitted:

September 24, 2013

Before NIEMEYER and
Senior Circuit Judge.

THACKER,

Decided:

Circuit

September 27, 2013

Judges,

and

HAMILTON,

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David Sanjurjo, Appellant Pro Se. Benjamin L. Hatch, Assistant
United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia; Stephen Wiley Miller,
Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 13-7037

Doc: 6

Filed: 09/27/2013

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
David
denying

his

18

Sanjurjo
U.S.C.

§

appeals

the

3582(c)(2)

district
(2006)

court’s

motion.

reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

order

We

have

Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

United

States v. Sanjurjo, No. 3:98-cr-00338-REP-1 (E.D. Va. May 9,
2013).
legal
before

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
contentions
this

court

are

adequately

and

argument

presented

would

not

in
aid

the
the

materials
decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

2