Tessa Childress v. Charleston Cnty Sheriff'

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:13-cv-01008-SB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999203326]. Mailed to: Tessa Childress. [13-7066]

Appeal: 13-7066

Doc: 9

Filed: 09/27/2013

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-7066

TESSA R. R. G. C. CHILDRESS, a/k/a Tessa Rani Raybourne
Childress,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
CHARLESTON
COUNTY
SHERIFF’S
OFFICE;
DANA
E
HERRON,
Inspector; INTERNAL AFFAIRS OFFICE OF THE PROFESSIONAL
STANDARDS, The Charleston County Sheriff’s Office,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston.
Solomon Blatt, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (2:13-cv-01008-SB)

Submitted:

September 24, 2013

Before NIEMEYER and
Senior Circuit Judge.

THACKER,

Decided:

Circuit

September 27, 2013

Judges,

and

HAMILTON,

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tessa R R G C Childress, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 13-7066

Doc: 9

Filed: 09/27/2013

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Tessa R.R.G.C. Childress appeals the district court’s
order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint.
have

reviewed

the

record

and

find

no

reversible

We

error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court.

Childress

v.

Charleston

Cnty.

2:13-cv-01008-SB (D.S.C. June 26, 2013).

Sheriff’s

Office,

No.

We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2