US v. Harold Field

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:89-cr-00251-JAB-1. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999246539]. Mailed to: Harold Fields. [13-7080]

Appeal: 13-7080

Doc: 20

Filed: 11/25/2013

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-7080

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
HAROLD FIELDS,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. James A. Beaty, Jr.,
District Judge. (2:89-cr-00251-JAB-1)

Submitted:

November 21, 2013

Decided:

November 25, 2013

Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Harold Fields, Appellant Pro Se.
Robert Michael
Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North
for Appellee.

Hamilton,
Carolina,

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 13-7080

Doc: 20

Filed: 11/25/2013

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Harold

Fields

appeals

the

district

court’s

order

denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence
reduction.
error.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. ∗
1

(M.D.N.C.

July

United States v. Fields, No. 2:89-cr-00251-JAB2,

2013).

We

dispense

with

oral

argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

∗

We further note that 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) is not the
appropriate mechanism to assert the retroactive application of
Alleyne v. United States, 133 S. Ct. 2151 (2013).

2