US v. James Tucker

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999169760-2]; denying Motion for transcript at government expense [999159828-2]. Originating case number: 2:11-cr-00079-RAJ-TEM-1. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999203156]. Mailed to: James Tucker. [13-7085]

Appeal: 13-7085

Doc: 12

Filed: 09/27/2013

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-7085

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
JAMES RAMON TUCKER,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District
Judge. (2:11-cr-00079-RAJ-TEM-1)

Submitted:

September 24, 2013

Before NIEMEYER and
Senior Circuit Judge.

THACKER,

Decided:

Circuit

September 27, 2013

Judges,

and

HAMILTON,

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Ramon Tucker, Appellant Pro Se.
Assistant
United
States
Attorney,
Appellee.

Sherrie Scott Capotosto,
Norfolk,
Virginia,
for

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 13-7085

Doc: 12

Filed: 09/27/2013

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
James Ramon Tucker appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion to compel the Government to file a Fed. R.
Crim. P 35(b) motion.
reversible

error.

We have reviewed the record and find no

Accordingly,

although

we

grant

leave

to

proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court.

United States v. Tucker, No. 2:11-cr-00079-

RAJ-TEM-1 (E.D. Va. June 19, 2013).

We deny Tucker’s motion for

transcripts at the government’s expense.

We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2