Eugene Cunningham v. Darlene Drew
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 9:11-cv-03179-CMC. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999286526]. Mailed to: Eugene Cunningham. [13-7150]
Appeal: 13-7150
Doc: 10
Filed: 01/29/2014
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-7150
EUGENE JEROME CUNNINGHAM,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
DARLENE DREW, Warden – FCI Bennettsville,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Beaufort.
Cameron McGowan Currie, District
Judge. (9:11-cv-03179-CMC)
Submitted:
January 22, 2014
Decided:
January 29, 2014
Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Eugene Jerome Cunningham, Appellant Pro Se.
Bowens, Assistant United States Attorney,
Carolina, for Appellee.
Barbara Murcier
Columbia, South
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 13-7150
Doc: 10
Filed: 01/29/2014
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Eugene
Jerome
Cunningham
appeals
from
the
district
court’s order denying his motion to void its earlier judgment
under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(4).
find no reversible error.
412-13
(4th
action).
dispense
Cir.
2005)
Accordingly,
with
contentions
are
oral
We have reviewed the record and
See Wendt v. Leonard, 431 F.3d 410,
(providing
we
affirm
argument
adequately
standard
the
Rule
challenged
because
presented
in
in
the
the
facts
60(b)(4)
order.
We
and
legal
materials
before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?