Joseph Cherry, II v. Terry O'Brien

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999170665-2] .Originating case number: 3:13-cv-00001-GMG-DJJ. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999221946]. Mailed to: Joseph Cherry. [13-7161]

Download PDF
Appeal: 13-7161 Doc: 10 Filed: 10/21/2013 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-7161 JOSEPH M. CHERRY, II, Petitioner - Appellant, v. WARDEN TERRY O’BRIEN, Respondent – Appellee, and USP HAZELTON, Respondent. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, District Judge. (3:13-cv-00001-GMG-DJJ) Submitted: October 17, 2013 Decided: October 21, 2013 Before AGEE, DAVIS, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Joseph M. Cherry, II, Appellant Pro Se. Helen Campbell Altmeyer, Jarod James Douglas, Assistant United States Attorneys, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee. Appeal: 13-7161 Doc: 10 Filed: 10/21/2013 Pg: 2 of 3 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 Appeal: 13-7161 Doc: 10 Filed: 10/21/2013 Pg: 3 of 3 PER CURIAM: Joseph M. Cherry, II, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp. 2013) petition. and find no reversible error. leave to court’s proceed order. in forma Cherry v. (N.D.W. Va. June 19, 2013). We have reviewed the record Accordingly, although we grant pauperis, O’Brien, we No. affirm the district 3:13-cv-00001-GMG-DJJ We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?