Mark Richards v. Wendy Brown

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:11-cv-00426-REP Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999226487]. Mailed to: Mark Richards. [13-7180]

Download PDF
Appeal: 13-7180 Doc: 11 Filed: 10/25/2013 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-7180 MARK E. RICHARDS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WENDY K. BROWN, Manager, Court and Legal Services Section, Virginia Department of Corrections, sued individual and official capacity; GARY L. BASS, Chief of Operations, Virginia Department of Corrections, sued individual and official capacity; LESLIE RITENOUR, Legal Researcher, Court and Legal Services Section, Virginia Department of Corrections, sued individual and official capacity, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:11-cv-00426-REP) Submitted: October 22, 2013 Decided: October 25, 2013 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mark E. Richards, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 13-7180 Doc: 11 Filed: 10/25/2013 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Mark E. Richards appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing as frivolous his complaint and denying his motion submitted under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59. and find no reversible error. We have reviewed the record Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Richards v. Brown, No. 3:11-cv-00426-REP (E.D. Va. Sept. 18, 2012; June 26, 2013). dispense with contentions are oral argument adequately because presented in the the facts We and legal materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?