Mark Richards v. Wendy Brown
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:11-cv-00426-REP Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999226487]. Mailed to: Mark Richards. [13-7180]
Appeal: 13-7180
Doc: 11
Filed: 10/25/2013
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-7180
MARK E. RICHARDS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WENDY K. BROWN, Manager, Court and Legal Services Section,
Virginia Department of Corrections, sued individual and
official capacity; GARY L. BASS, Chief of Operations,
Virginia Department of Corrections, sued individual and
official capacity; LESLIE RITENOUR, Legal Researcher, Court
and
Legal
Services
Section,
Virginia
Department
of
Corrections, sued individual and official capacity,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond.
Robert E. Payne, Senior
District Judge. (3:11-cv-00426-REP)
Submitted:
October 22, 2013
Decided:
October 25, 2013
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mark E. Richards, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 13-7180
Doc: 11
Filed: 10/25/2013
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Mark E. Richards appeals the district court’s orders
accepting
the
recommendation
of
the
magistrate
judge
and
dismissing as frivolous his complaint and denying his motion
submitted under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59.
and find no reversible error.
We have reviewed the record
Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court.
Richards v. Brown, No.
3:11-cv-00426-REP (E.D. Va. Sept. 18, 2012; June 26, 2013).
dispense
with
contentions
are
oral
argument
adequately
because
presented
in
the
the
facts
We
and
legal
materials
before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?