US v. Bruce Johnson
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 4:02-cr-00579-CWH-2 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999226444]. Mailed to: Bruce Johnson. [13-7228]
Appeal: 13-7228
Doc: 9
Filed: 10/25/2013
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-7228
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
BRUCE LEE JOHNSON,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence.
C. Weston Houck, Senior District
Judge. (4:02-cr-00579-CWH-2)
Submitted:
October 22, 2013
Decided:
October 25, 2013
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Bruce Lee Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Frank Daley, Jr.,
Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina;
William E. Day II, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence,
South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 13-7228
Doc: 9
Filed: 10/25/2013
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Bruce Lee Johnson appeals the district court’s order
denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a sentence
reduction.
error.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court.
United States v. Johnson, No. 4:02-cr-00579-
CWH-2 (D.S.C. July 22, 2013).
We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?