US v. Tyrone Campbell

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case numbers: 1:10-cr-00218-WMN-1, 1:13-cv-00471-WMN. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999265049]. Mailed to: appellant. [13-7292]

Download PDF
Appeal: 13-7292 Doc: 10 Filed: 12/23/2013 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-7292 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. TYRONE ROBERT CAMPBELL, a/k/a Mr. Muhammad, a/k/a Muhammad Shahid, a/k/a Tyrone Moore, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, Senior District Judge. (1:10-cr-00218-WMN-1; 1:13-cv-00471-WMN) Submitted: December 19, 2013 Decided: December 23, 2013 Before SHEDD, DAVIS, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Tyrone Robert Campbell, Appellant Pro Se. Sujit Raman, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 13-7292 Doc: 10 Filed: 12/23/2013 Pg: 2 of 3 PER CURIAM: Tyrone Robert Campbell seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing (West Supp. 2013) motion. as untimely his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” (2006). 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this jurists would reasonable standard find by that demonstrating the district that court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). denies relief demonstrate on both procedural that the When the district court grounds, dispositive the prisoner procedural must ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Campbell has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument 2 because the facts and legal Appeal: 13-7292 Doc: 10 contentions are Filed: 12/23/2013 adequately Pg: 3 of 3 presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?