Henry Martin, Jr. v. William Byars, Jr.

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 6:12-cv-01089-CMC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999226503]. Mailed to: Henry Martin. [13-7326]

Appeal: 13-7326

Doc: 13

Filed: 10/25/2013

Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-7326

HENRY W. MARTIN, JR.,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
WILLIAM R. BYARS, JR., Director; DR. MOORE, Director of
Medical Services; DR. T. BYRNE, ACI; DR. G. AMONITTI, LCI;
NURSE DERRICK, ACI Health Care Authority; WAYNE C. MCCABE,
Warden
LCI;
LISA
HOPOLOMBER,
Nurse
Practice
Lieber
Correction Institution; JOSEPH MCFADDEN, Associate Warden
Lieber Correction Institution; LUCLNECIA BRYANT, Mail Room
Assistant Lieber Correction Institution; ROSE MONTEE,
Business Office Lieber Correction Institution; CPL. T.
SIMPSON, Allendale Correctional Institution; CPL. MELVIN
DRAYTON,
Allendale
Correctional
Institution;
ELIZABETH
HOLCOMB, Nurse Praction Lieber Correction Institution; STAR
CONNELLY, Nurse Practice Lieber Correction Institution;
SYLNA JONES, Mail Room Supervisory Lieber Correction
Institution,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
JAMIE R. WRESSEY, RN Health Care Authority SC Dept of
Corrections; DANIEL MURPHY, Department of Corrections
Division Inspection SCDC; ALTHEA B. MYERS, Chief Deputy
Office of the Investigation & Enforcement; CHATHERINE
TEMPLETON, Director LLR; NANCY MURPHY, Administrative Board
of Nursing; DAVID M. TATARSKY, DOC Office of General
Counsel; ANN HALLMAN, DOC Branch Chief Inmate Grievance
Branch; BRANCH CHIEF, Inmate Grievance Branch; BLAKE
TAYLOR, DOC Compliance Standard and Inspections; LESIA
KUDELKA, LLR Communications Director; MARK DORMAN, LLR OIE
Assistance Deputy Director; ASSISTANCE DEPUTY DIRECTOR;
MARK SANDERS, Investigator LLR OIE; JOHN R. PATE, Warden
Allendale Correction Institution; AUTHUR A. JORDAM, JR.,

Appeal: 13-7326

Doc: 13

Filed: 10/25/2013

Pg: 2 of 3

Associate
Warden;
MCKENNDLY
NEWTON,
Associate
Warden
Allendale
Correction
Institution;
E.
GRIMES,
Capital
Allendale Correction Institution; DR. JONI STANFORD, SC
Dept of Correction Physician; L. NEWSOM, Nurse RN Lieber
Correction Institution; DR. ROWLAND CRAFTS, SC Department
of Corrections; GREGORY S. LINE, Director of Claims; ELLEN
GOODWIN,
SC
State
Accident
Fund;
RUSSELL
RUSH,
SC
Department of Corrections; JIM CROSBY, SC Department of
Corrections; SUSAN S. BARDEN, SC Workers Compensation;
VIRGINIA
CROCKER,
Judicial
Director;
CHRISTOPHER
D.
FLORIAN, Staff Attorney; DR. MARSHA KOLLER, Director of
Health Service; CAPTAIN STANLEY CLARK, Lieber Correction
Institution;
SGT.
ROBERT
MINCELY,
Lieber
Correction
Institution;
CPL.
EARL
BARRETT,
Lieber
Correctional
Institution; MAJOR THIERRY NETTLER, Lieber Correction
Institution; ASSOCIATE WARDEN FRED R. THOMPSON; DAGLES
WESTELY,
III,
Kirkland
Librarian;
PATICIRA
COOK,
Classification Case Work; CHARLOTTE SMITH, Claims Adjuster;
CAROLYN TYSON, Nurse RN Lieber Correction Institution,
Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Greenville. Cameron McGowan Currie, District
Judge. (6:12-cv-01089-CMC)

Submitted:

October 22, 2013

Decided:

October 25, 2013

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Henry W. Martin, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Michael Charles Tanner,
MICHAEL C. TANNER LAW OFFICE, Bamberg, South Carolina, for
Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 13-7326

Doc: 13

Filed: 10/25/2013

Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
Henry

W.

Martin,

Jr.,

appeals

the

district

court’s

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint.
have

reviewed

the

record

and

find

no

reversible

We

error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court.

Martin v. Byars, No. 6:12-01089-CMC (D.S.C. July 11,

2013).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal
before

contentions
this

court

are

adequately

and

argument

presented

would

not

in
aid

the
the

materials
decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

3