Kevin Fuller v. J. Stouffer
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:12-cv-02914-AW Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999291254]. Mailed to: Kevin Fuller. [13-7379]
Appeal: 13-7379
Doc: 12
Filed: 02/05/2014
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-7379
KEVIN FULLER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
J. MICHAEL STOUFFER, Commissioner; BOBBY P. SHEARIN, Warden;
FERRIS, C.O. II; V. WARNICK, Psychologist; MS. LESLIE SMITH,
Case Manager; DIANNE HARVEY, R.N.; LAMBERT, C.O. II; WILT,
Lt.; MCALPINE, Lt.; HARBOUGH, Lt.; GRAHAM, Sgt.; TEAL, C.O.
II; ANDERSON, C.O. II; ANITA ROZAS, Social Worker; MS.
HOUSEHOLDER, BMP Secretary; DR. BRUCE LILLER; BANKS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Alexander Williams, Jr., District
Judge. (8:12-cv-02914-AW)
Submitted:
January 28, 2014
Decided:
February 5, 2014
Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kevin Fuller, Appellant Pro Se.
Rex Schultz Gordon, OFFICE OF
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland; Jennifer
E. Cameron, MARKS, O’NEILL, O’BRIEN, DOHERTY & KELLY, P.C.,
Towson, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 13-7379
Doc: 12
Filed: 02/05/2014
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Kevin
Fuller
appeals
the
district
court’s
order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint.
have
reviewed
the
record
and
find
no
reversible
We
error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court.
Fuller v. Stouffer, No. 8:12-cv-02914-AW (D. Md. July 1
& July 22, 2013).
facts
and
materials
legal
before
We dispense with oral argument because the
contentions
are
adequately
this
and
argument
court
presented
would
not
in
the
aid
the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?