Kevin Fuller v. J. Stouffer

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:12-cv-02914-AW Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999291254]. Mailed to: Kevin Fuller. [13-7379]

Download PDF
Appeal: 13-7379 Doc: 12 Filed: 02/05/2014 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-7379 KEVIN FULLER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. J. MICHAEL STOUFFER, Commissioner; BOBBY P. SHEARIN, Warden; FERRIS, C.O. II; V. WARNICK, Psychologist; MS. LESLIE SMITH, Case Manager; DIANNE HARVEY, R.N.; LAMBERT, C.O. II; WILT, Lt.; MCALPINE, Lt.; HARBOUGH, Lt.; GRAHAM, Sgt.; TEAL, C.O. II; ANDERSON, C.O. II; ANITA ROZAS, Social Worker; MS. HOUSEHOLDER, BMP Secretary; DR. BRUCE LILLER; BANKS, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (8:12-cv-02914-AW) Submitted: January 28, 2014 Decided: February 5, 2014 Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kevin Fuller, Appellant Pro Se. Rex Schultz Gordon, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland; Jennifer E. Cameron, MARKS, O’NEILL, O’BRIEN, DOHERTY & KELLY, P.C., Towson, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 13-7379 Doc: 12 Filed: 02/05/2014 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Kevin Fuller appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. have reviewed the record and find no reversible We error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Fuller v. Stouffer, No. 8:12-cv-02914-AW (D. Md. July 1 & July 22, 2013). facts and materials legal before We dispense with oral argument because the contentions are adequately this and argument court presented would not in the aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?