Torrick Rodgers v. Waste Industries Incorporation

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying motion to present newly discovered evidence [999218100-2] Originating case number: 4:12-cv-00294-FL Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999288139]. Mailed to: Torrick Rodgers. [13-7418]

Appeal: 13-7418

Doc: 22

Filed: 01/31/2014

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-7418

TORRICK JOHNTRELLE RODGERS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WASTE INDUSTRIES INCORPORATION,
Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Louise W. Flanagan,
District Judge. (4:12-cv-00294-FL)

Submitted:

January 22, 2014

Decided:

January 31, 2014

Before SHEDD, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Torrick Johntrelle Rodgers, Appellant Pro Se.
Tobias Samuel
Hampson, Paul J. Puryear, Jr., WYRICK, ROBBINS, YATES & PONTON,
LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 13-7418

Doc: 22

Filed: 01/31/2014

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Torrick
court’s

order

Johntrelle

accepting

the

Rodgers

appeals

recommendation

of

the
the

district
magistrate

judge and granting the Defendant’s motion to dismiss his civil
complaint under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6).
record and find no reversible error.

We have reviewed the

Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court.

See Rodgers v. Waste

Indus. Inc., No. 4:12-cv-00294-FL (E.D.N.C. Aug. 22, 2013).

We

deny Rodgers’s motion to present newly discovered evidence.

We

dispense

with

contentions

are

oral

argument

adequately

because

presented

in

the
the

facts

and

legal

materials

before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2