Harold Thornton v. Terry O'Brien
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999218202-2] Originating case number: 5:12-cv-00074-FPS-JSK Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999266012]. Mailed to: Thornton. [13-7539]
Appeal: 13-7539
Doc: 17
Filed: 12/24/2013
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-7539
HAROLD JEROME THORNTON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
TERRY O’BRIEN, Warden; BRINSON, Lieutenant, Agent formerly
known as Brenson; J. SQUIRES, Officer, Agent formerly known
as John Doe #1; A. CRAWFORD, Counselor, Agent formerly
known as John Doe #2,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Wheeling.
Frederick P. Stamp,
Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:12-cv-00074-FPS-JSK)
Submitted:
December 19, 2013
Decided:
December 24, 2013
Before SHEDD, DAVIS, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Harold Jerome Thornton, Appellant Pro Se. Jarod James Douglas,
Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 13-7539
Doc: 17
Filed: 12/24/2013
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Harold
Jerome
Thornton
appeals
the
district
court’s
order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six
Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388
(1971).
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court.
(N.D.W.
Va.
appoint
counsel
facts
and
materials
Thornton v. O’Brien, No. 5:12-cv-00074-FPS-JSK
Aug.
legal
before
21,
and
2013).
We
deny
Thornton’s
dispense
with
oral
argument
contentions
are
adequately
this
and
argument
court
motion
because
presented
would
not
to
the
in
the
aid
the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?