Harold Thornton v. Terry O'Brien

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999218202-2] Originating case number: 5:12-cv-00074-FPS-JSK Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999266012]. Mailed to: Thornton. [13-7539]

Download PDF
Appeal: 13-7539 Doc: 17 Filed: 12/24/2013 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-7539 HAROLD JEROME THORNTON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. TERRY O’BRIEN, Warden; BRINSON, Lieutenant, Agent formerly known as Brenson; J. SQUIRES, Officer, Agent formerly known as John Doe #1; A. CRAWFORD, Counselor, Agent formerly known as John Doe #2, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:12-cv-00074-FPS-JSK) Submitted: December 19, 2013 Decided: December 24, 2013 Before SHEDD, DAVIS, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Harold Jerome Thornton, Appellant Pro Se. Jarod James Douglas, Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 13-7539 Doc: 17 Filed: 12/24/2013 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Harold Jerome Thornton appeals the district court’s order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. (N.D.W. Va. appoint counsel facts and materials Thornton v. O’Brien, No. 5:12-cv-00074-FPS-JSK Aug. legal before 21, and 2013). We deny Thornton’s dispense with oral argument contentions are adequately this and argument court motion because presented would not to the in the aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?