Larry Tart v. Kelly Dufault

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for location of defendant [999241853-2] Originating case number: 5:12-ct-03127-F Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999283350]. Mailed to: appellant. [13-7564]

Appeal: 13-7564

Doc: 18

Filed: 01/24/2014

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-7564

LARRY R. TART,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
KELLY DUFAULT; WARDEN ADMINISTRATOR I; JOHNNY
SUPERINTENDENT JOYCE KORNEGAY; FINESSE G. COUCH,

HAWKINS;

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
James C. Fox, Senior
District Judge. (5:12-ct-03127-F)

Submitted:

January 21, 2014

Decided: January 24, 2014

Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Larry R. Tart, Appellant Pro Se.
Peter Andrew Regulski,
Assistant
Attorney
General,
Raleigh,
North
Carolina,
for
Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 13-7564

Doc: 18

Filed: 01/24/2014

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Larry R. Tart seeks to appeal the district court’s
order denying his motion for a temporary restraining order and
other motions for relief.

This court may exercise jurisdiction

only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain
interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006);
Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,
337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949).
neither

a

final

collateral order.
of

jurisdiction

defendant.
legal
before

nor

an

appealable

interlocutory

or

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack
and

deny

Tart’s

motion

for

location

of

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

contentions
this

order

The order Tart seeks to appeal is

court

are

adequately

and

argument

presented

would

not

in
aid

the
the

materials
decisional

process.

DISMISSED

2