Lord Versatile v. Loretta Kelly

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:12-cv-00333-HEH Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999303432]. Mailed to: Versatile. [13-7587]

Appeal: 13-7587

Doc: 8

Filed: 02/25/2014

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-7587

LORD VERSATILE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
LORETTA KELLY, Warden (Former), Sussex I State Prison; A. F.
MILLER, Operations Officer, Warden - Designee, Sussex I
State Prison; R. W. SPROUSE, CO, Investigator, Sussex I
State Prison; W. BROWN, Hearings Officer, Sussex I State
Prison,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond.
Henry E. Hudson, District
Judge. (3:12-cv-00333-HEH)

Submitted:

February 20, 2014

Decided:

February 25, 2014

Before DUNCAN, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lord Versatile, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 13-7587

Doc: 8

Filed: 02/25/2014

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Lord
district
magistrate
(2006)

Versatile,

court’s
judge

complaint.

reversible error.

order
and

a

Virginia

accepting

denying

We

have

the

relief
reviewed

inmate,

appeals

recommendation

on

his

the

42

record

of

U.S.C.
and

the
the

§ 1983

find

no

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court.

Versatile v. Kelly, No. 3:12-cv-00333-

HEH (E.D. Va. Sept. 9, 2013).

We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

2