US v. Reggie Kelley
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion certificate of appealability (Local Rule 22(a)) [999273656-2] Originating case number: 3:04-cr-00998-CMC-1,3:13-cv-02494-CMC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999324133]. Mailed to: Reggie Lamar Kelley. [13-7632]
Appeal: 13-7632
Doc: 16
Filed: 03/27/2014
Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-7632
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
REGGIE LAMAR KELLEY, a/k/a Lil Red,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia.
Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior
District Judge. (3:04-cr-00998-CMC-1; 3:13-cv-02494-CMC)
Submitted:
March 25, 2014
Decided:
March 27, 2014
Before GREGORY, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Reggie Lamar Kelley, Appellant Pro Se. Jimmie Ewing, Assistant
United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 13-7632
Doc: 16
Filed: 03/27/2014
Pg: 2 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Reggie
Lamar
Kelley
seeks
to
appeal
the
district
court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion as
successive and unauthorized, and he has filed a motion for a
certificate of appealability.
appealable
unless
a
The district court’s order is not
circuit
certificate of appealability.
A
certificate
of
justice
or
judge
issues
a
28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012).
appealability
will
not
issue
absent
“a
substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.”
28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012).
relief
on
the
demonstrating
district
merits,
that
court’s
debatable
or
a
When the district court denies
prisoner
reasonable
assessment
wrong.
satisfies
jurists
would
of
the
v.
McDaniel,
Slack
this
standard
find
U.S.
that
the
claims
constitutional
529
by
is
473,
484
(2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003).
When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the
prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural
ruling
is
debatable,
and
that
the
motion
states
claim of the denial of a constitutional right.
a
debatable
Slack, 529 U.S.
at 484-85.
We have independently reviewed the record and conclude
that Kelley has not made the requisite showing.
Accordingly, we
deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal.
dispense
with
oral
argument
because
2
the
facts
and
We
legal
Appeal: 13-7632
Doc: 16
contentions
are
Filed: 03/27/2014
adequately
Pg: 3 of 3
presented
in
the
materials
before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?