Travis Kemp v. Paul Drago
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for default judgment [999303669-2] Originating case number: 1:12-cv-01481-JFA Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999308737]. Mailed to: Kemp. [13-7647]
Appeal: 13-7647
Doc: 35
Filed: 03/05/2014
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-7647
TRAVIS MANDELL KEMP,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
PAUL C. DRAGO; CECILIA REYNOLDS; JEANNA MCKAY; JERRY
WASHINGTON; INVESTIGATOR
ROBERTSON; DARREN SEWARD; DANIEL
DEBOSE; TONYA HUNTLEY; WYANE THOMPSON; DERRICK MUNGO; ALLAH
BROWN; LESTER SMALL; JOSEPH STINNET; PAMELA HOUGH; ANN
SETTLERS; LUANNE M. MUNGO; LINDA M. COLEY; LINDA K. LACKEY;
DORIS A. COOKE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Aiken.
Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District
Judge. (1:12-cv-01481-JFA)
Submitted:
February 25, 2014
Decided:
March 5, 2014
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Travis Mandell Kemp, Appellant Pro Se. James E. Parham, Jr.,
Irmo, South Carolina; William Henry Davidson, II, David Allen
DeMasters, Joel Steve Hughes, DAVIDSON & LINDEMANN, PA,
Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 13-7647
Doc: 35
Filed: 03/05/2014
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Travis Mandell Kemp appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief
on
his
42
U.S.C.
§ 1983
(2006)
complaint.
reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
We
have
Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Kemp v.
Drago, No. 1:12-cv-01481-JFA (D.S.C. Sept. 11, 2013).
We deny
Kemp’s
motion
for
default
judgment
and
dispense
with
oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?