US v. Jonathan Hough
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 4:05-cr-00037-RBS-FBS-8 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999326409]. Mailed to: Jonathan Hough. [13-7697]
Appeal: 13-7697
Doc: 9
Filed: 03/31/2014
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-7697
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
JONATHAN HOUGH,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Newport News.
Rebecca Beach Smith,
Chief District Judge. (4:05-cr-00037-RBS-FBS-8)
Submitted:
March 27, 2014
Before MOTZ, Circuit
Circuit Judges.
Judge,
Decided: March 31, 2014
and
HAMILTON
and
DAVIS,
Senior
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jonathan Hough, Appellant Pro Se. Eric Matthew Hurt, Assistant
United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 13-7697
Doc: 9
Filed: 03/31/2014
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Jonathan
Hough
appeals
the
district
court’s
order
denying his motion to reconsider the court’s previous denial of
his
18
U.S.C.
reduction.
error.
§ 3582(c)(2)
(2012)
motion
for
a
sentence
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
See United States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 235-36 (4th
Cir. 2010) (holding that district court does not have authority
to reconsider prior order on § 3582 motion).
Accordingly, we
affirm the district court’s denial of relief.
We dispense with
oral
contentions
argument
adequately
because
presented
in
the
the
facts
and
materials
legal
before
this
court
are
and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?