US v. Jonathan Hough

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 4:05-cr-00037-RBS-FBS-8 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999326409]. Mailed to: Jonathan Hough. [13-7697]

Download PDF
Appeal: 13-7697 Doc: 9 Filed: 03/31/2014 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-7697 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. JONATHAN HOUGH, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief District Judge. (4:05-cr-00037-RBS-FBS-8) Submitted: March 27, 2014 Before MOTZ, Circuit Circuit Judges. Judge, Decided: March 31, 2014 and HAMILTON and DAVIS, Senior Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jonathan Hough, Appellant Pro Se. Eric Matthew Hurt, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 13-7697 Doc: 9 Filed: 03/31/2014 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Jonathan Hough appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to reconsider the court’s previous denial of his 18 U.S.C. reduction. error. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence We have reviewed the record and find no reversible See United States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 235-36 (4th Cir. 2010) (holding that district court does not have authority to reconsider prior order on § 3582 motion). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s denial of relief. We dispense with oral contentions argument adequately because presented in the the facts and materials legal before this court are and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?