Aaron French v. Allegany County

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:11-cv-02600-CCB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999344859]. Mailed to: Aaron French. [13-7791]

Download PDF
Appeal: 13-7791 Doc: 17 Filed: 04/28/2014 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-7791 AARON LITTLE FRENCH, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ALLEGANY COUNTY; SCOTT OAKLEY, Inmate Grievance; OFFICE DIRECTOR; MICHAEL STOUFFER, DOC Commissioner; BOBBY SHEARIN, Warden; JOHN GALLEY; OFFICER SUTHERLAND; OFFICER METTY; OFFICER ICKES; OFFICER LAMBERT; SERGEANT THOMAS; OFFICER MAWHINNEY; MARY JANE ROSE; MAILROOM SUPERVISOR; OFFICER MEAGER, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (1:11-cv-02600-CCB) Submitted: April 24, 2014 Decided: April 28, 2014 Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Aaron Little French, Appellant Pro Se. Rodger Owen Robertson, LAW OFFICE OF JOSEPH M. JAGIELSKI, Baltimore, Maryland; Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 13-7791 Doc: 17 Filed: 04/28/2014 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Aaron Little French appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his motion to reconsider the court’s earlier orders dismissing (2006) complaint. reversible error. the claims raised have reviewed We (D. Md. his the 42 record U.S.C. and § 1983 find no Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. 02600-CCB in Oct. French v. Allegany Cnty., No. 1:11-cv16, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?