Aaron French v. Allegany County
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:11-cv-02600-CCB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999344859]. Mailed to: Aaron French. [13-7791]
Appeal: 13-7791
Doc: 17
Filed: 04/28/2014
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-7791
AARON LITTLE FRENCH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ALLEGANY COUNTY; SCOTT OAKLEY, Inmate Grievance; OFFICE
DIRECTOR; MICHAEL STOUFFER, DOC Commissioner; BOBBY SHEARIN,
Warden; JOHN GALLEY; OFFICER SUTHERLAND; OFFICER METTY;
OFFICER ICKES; OFFICER LAMBERT; SERGEANT THOMAS; OFFICER
MAWHINNEY; MARY JANE ROSE; MAILROOM SUPERVISOR; OFFICER
MEAGER,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
Catherine C. Blake, District Judge.
(1:11-cv-02600-CCB)
Submitted:
April 24, 2014
Decided:
April 28, 2014
Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Aaron Little French, Appellant Pro Se.
Rodger Owen Robertson,
LAW OFFICE OF JOSEPH M. JAGIELSKI, Baltimore, Maryland;
Stephanie
Judith
Lane-Weber,
Assistant
Attorney
General,
Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 13-7791
Doc: 17
Filed: 04/28/2014
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Aaron Little French appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his motion to reconsider the court’s earlier
orders
dismissing
(2006)
complaint.
reversible error.
the
claims
raised
have
reviewed
We
(D.
Md.
his
the
42
record
U.S.C.
and
§ 1983
find
no
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court.
02600-CCB
in
Oct.
French v. Allegany Cnty., No. 1:11-cv16,
2013).
We
dispense
with
oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?