US v. William Cro

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:03-cr-00010-RBS-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999304466].. [13-7802]

Appeal: 13-7802

Doc: 7

Filed: 02/26/2014

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-7802

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
WILLIAM TERRENCE CROSS, a/k/a Red,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk.
Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief
District Judge. (2:03-cr-00010-RBS-1)

Submitted:

February 20, 2014

Decided:

February 26, 2014

Before DUNCAN, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Terrence Cross, Appellant
Tayman,
Assistant
United
States
Virginia, for Appellee.

Pro Se. Laura Pellatiro
Attorney,
Newport
News,

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 13-7802

Doc: 7

Filed: 02/26/2014

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
William
order

denying

Cross
his

appeals

Fed.

R.

the
Civ.

district
P.

court’s

60(b)

margin

motion *

for

reconsideration of the district court’s 2003 order denying his
motion to dismiss criminal charges for lack of jurisdiction.

We

have reviewed the record in this appeal and conclude that the
district
States v.

court

2013).
legal
before

did

Cross,

not

No.

commit

reversible

2:03-cr-00010-RBS-1

error.

(E.D.

Va.

United
Oct.

23,

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
contentions
this

court

are

adequately

and

argument

presented

would

not

in
aid

the
the

materials
decisional

process.
AFFIRMED

*

Although the district court order that Cross sought
reconsideration of was entered in his criminal case, Cross
attempted to use a civil rule to effect reconsideration.

2