Larry Green v. North Carolina Dept of Corr
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:11-ct-03175-BO Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999326287].. [13-7819]
Appeal: 13-7819
Doc: 22
Filed: 03/31/2014
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-7819
LARRY KEITH GREEN, a/k/a Said Abdullah Hakim,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; CARLTON B.
JOYNER; TRESA BROWN TOMLINSON; BOBBY W. MARSHALL; G.
BLACKMAN; H. CLAY; SERGEANT STRICKLAND; D. STANLEY; J.
MARTIN, Governor; T. GULLEY; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER COBB;
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER PRATT; B. TALLY; JOSEPH UMESI; CARMEN
HENDRICKS; HOPE SMITH; D. STRICKLAND; JOHN ASLETT; M.
REYNOLDS; P. DAVIS; W. LUNSFORD; THOMAS TART,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (5:11-ct-03175-BO)
Submitted:
March 27, 2014
Before MOTZ, Circuit
Circuit Judges.
Judge,
Decided:
and
HAMILTON
and
March 31, 2014
DAVIS,
Senior
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Larry Keith Green, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 13-7819
Doc: 22
Filed: 03/31/2014
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Larry Keith Green appeals the district court’s orders
dismissing
his
42
U.S.C.
§ 1983
(2006)
complaint
without
prejudice under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012), and denying
his motion for reconsideration.
find
no
reversible
error.
We have reviewed the record and
Accordingly,
reasons stated by the district court.
Dep’t
of
Oct. 29,
facts
Corr.,
2013).
and
materials
No.
legal
before
We
with
oral
(E.D.N.C.
argument
contentions
are
adequately
this
and
argument
court
affirm
for
the
Green v. North Carolina
5:11-ct-03175-BO
dispense
we
June
because
presented
would
26
not
&
the
in
the
aid
the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?