Larry Green v. North Carolina Dept of Corr

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:11-ct-03175-BO Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999326287].. [13-7819]

Download PDF
Appeal: 13-7819 Doc: 22 Filed: 03/31/2014 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-7819 LARRY KEITH GREEN, a/k/a Said Abdullah Hakim, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; CARLTON B. JOYNER; TRESA BROWN TOMLINSON; BOBBY W. MARSHALL; G. BLACKMAN; H. CLAY; SERGEANT STRICKLAND; D. STANLEY; J. MARTIN, Governor; T. GULLEY; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER COBB; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER PRATT; B. TALLY; JOSEPH UMESI; CARMEN HENDRICKS; HOPE SMITH; D. STRICKLAND; JOHN ASLETT; M. REYNOLDS; P. DAVIS; W. LUNSFORD; THOMAS TART, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:11-ct-03175-BO) Submitted: March 27, 2014 Before MOTZ, Circuit Circuit Judges. Judge, Decided: and HAMILTON and March 31, 2014 DAVIS, Senior Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Larry Keith Green, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 13-7819 Doc: 22 Filed: 03/31/2014 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Larry Keith Green appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012), and denying his motion for reconsideration. find no reversible error. We have reviewed the record and Accordingly, reasons stated by the district court. Dep’t of Oct. 29, facts Corr., 2013). and materials No. legal before We with oral (E.D.N.C. argument contentions are adequately this and argument court affirm for the Green v. North Carolina 5:11-ct-03175-BO dispense we June because presented would 26 not & the in the aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?