US v. Raymond O. Leech

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:06-cr-00427-WDQ-2,1:12-cv-02143-WDQ. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999344660]. Mailed to: Raymond Leech. [13-7870]

Appeal: 13-7870

Doc: 12

Filed: 04/28/2014

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-7870

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
RAYMOND O. LEECH, a/k/a Neil,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
William D. Quarles, Jr., District
Judge. (1:06-cr-00427-WDQ-2; 1:12-cv-02143-WDQ)

Submitted:

April 24, 2014

Decided:

April 28, 2014

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Raymond O. Leech, Appellant Pro Se.
Michael Clayton Hanlon,
Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 13-7870

Doc: 12

Filed: 04/28/2014

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Raymond O. Leech appeals the district court’s order
denying his Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) motion, in
which

he

attempted

to

conviction and sentence.
no reversible error.

collaterally

challenge

his

criminal

We have reviewed the record and find

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court.

United States v. Leech, No. 1:06-

cr-00427-WDQ-2 (D. Md. Oct. 18, 2013).

We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2