US v. Michael William

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:95-cr-00009-H-1. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999323168]. Mailed to: Michael Williams. [13-7913]

Appeal: 13-7913

Doc: 8

Filed: 03/26/2014

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-7913

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
MICHAEL CRANDALE WILLIAMS,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Elizabeth City.
Malcolm J.
Howard, Senior District Judge. (2:95-cr-00009-H-1)

Submitted:

March 6, 2014

Decided:

March 26, 2014

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Crandale Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Robert J. Higdon,
Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North
Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 13-7913

Doc: 8

Filed: 03/26/2014

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Michael Crandale Williams appeals the district court’s
order

granting

his

motion

for

a

sentence

reduction

under

18

U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) and reducing his sentence to the low
end of his amended Guidelines range. *
record and find no reversible error.
district

court’s

order.

See

We have reviewed the

Accordingly, we affirm the

United

States

2:95-cr-00009-H-1 (E.D.N.C. Nov. 7, 2013).
oral

argument

adequately

because

presented

in

the
the

facts

and

materials

v.

Williams,

No.

We dispense with

legal
before

contentions
this

court

are
and

argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

*

Williams contends he is entitled to a further reduction.

2