Isaac Woods v. County of Wilson

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:10-ct-03118-BO. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999390729]. Mailed to: I. Woods. [13-7970]

Appeal: 13-7970

Doc: 33

Filed: 07/08/2014

Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-7970

ISAAC LEE WOODS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
COUNTY OF WILSON; WILSON COUNTY MANAGER; WAYNE GAY, Sheriff
of Wilson County; R. S. JOHNSON, Jail Administrator;
DEPUTY/OFFICER “A”; DEPUTY/OFFICER “B”; DEPUTY/OFFICER “C”;
DEPUTY/OFFICER “D”; DEPUTY/OFFICER “E”; INMATE A; UNITED
STATES MARSHAL SERVICE; 13 THRU 24 DEPUTY U.S. MARSHAL “A”
THRU “K”; UNITED STATES MARSHAL EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH
CAROLINA; COUNTY OF WAKE; WAKE COUNTY MANAGER; DONNIE
HARRISON, Sheriff of Wake County; FRANK O. GUNTER, Director
of Detention Service Wake County; 30 THRU 33 DEPUTY/OFFICER
“A” THRU “D”; WAKE COUNTY NURSE “A”; WESTERN TIDEWATER
REGIONAL JAIL; JEFFREY L. NEWTON, Superintendent; MEDICAL
DIRECTOR, Western Tidewater Regional Jail; MEDICAL DOCTOR;
NURSE “A”, Western Tidewater Regional Jail; 40 THRU 45
OFFICER “A” THRU “F”, Western Tidewater Regional Jail;
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS; WARDEN; L. WILES, M.D.; M.
COOVER, Paramedic; NURSE “A”, Federal Transfer Center;
WARDEN,
F.D.C.
Philadelphia;
MEDICAL
DIRECTOR,
F.D.C.
Philadelphia; M. PENA SILVA, RN, F.D.C. Philadelphia;
WARDEN, M.D.C. Brooklyn; MEDICAL DIRECTOR, M.D.C. Brooklyn;
PHYSICAL
ASSISTANCE,
M.D.C.
Brooklyn;
NURSE,
M.D.C.
Brooklyn; CAROLYN SABOL, Warden, F.M.C. Devens; K. TRACEY,
Assoc. Warden of Medical, F.M.C. Devens; C. HOWARD, M.D.,
F.M.C. Devens; H. BEAM, M.D., F.M.C. Devens; M. HOWES, LPN,
F.M.C. Devens; M.
MONTCALRO, PAC, F.M.C. Devens; MEDICAL
DIRECTOR, F.M.C. Devens; WAYNE PHILLIPS, Warden; JOEL
SIEGLER, Warden, F.C.I. Morgantown; J.G. ESPARZA, Assoc.
Warden; MICHAEL WATERS, M.D., F.C.I. Morgantown; LEWIS
BRESCOACH,
Medical
Director,
F.C.I.
Morgantown;
RENEE
CROGAN, Asst. Medical Director, F.C.I. Morgantown; PAUL
EDWARDS, Counselor, F.C.I. Morgantown; KENNETH ADAMS, Unit
Manager, F.C.I. Morgantown; DANIEL SHAW, F.C.I. Morgantown;
R. TRYBUS; DURANCKO; CHERYL VANHORN, OD; WILLIAM LAYHUE;

Appeal: 13-7970

Doc: 33

Filed: 07/08/2014

Pg: 2 of 3

RAMOS; KIM
M. WHITE; WILSON COUNTY JAIL NURSE; D. SCOTT
DODRILL; MARK MANSELL,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (5:10-ct-03118-BO)

Submitted:

June 13, 2014

Decided:

July 8, 2014

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Isaac Lee Woods, Appellant Pro Se. James R. Morgan, Jr., WOMBLE
CARLYLE SANDRIDGE & RICE, PLLC, Winston-Salem, North Carolina;
John Albert Maxfield, Roger Allen Askew, COUNTY ATTORNEY’S
OFFICE FOR THE COUNTY OF WAKE, Raleigh, North Caronia; Edward D.
Gray, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina;
Jim H. Guynn, Jr., Cathleen Kailani Memmer, GUYNN, MEMMER &
DILLON, PC, Salem, Virginia; Heather Graham Connor, Jeffrey
Brandt Kuykendal, MCANGUS, GOUDELOCK & COURIE, LLC, Charlotte,
North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 13-7970

Doc: 33

Filed: 07/08/2014

Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
Isaac Lee Woods appeals the district court’s judgment
dismissing his civil rights complaint.

We have reviewed the

court’s orders and the record and affirm substantially for the
reasons stated by the district court.

See Woods v. County of

Wilson, No. 5:10-ct-03118-BO (E.D.N.C. Feb. 6, 2014).

Insofar

as the court dismissed the complaint without prejudice against
Wake

County

and

the

Wake

County

Defendants

for

failing

to

exhaust administrative remedies, even if the Defendants failed
to show that Woods had available administrative remedies that he
failed to utilize, we affirm on the basis that Woods failed to
state a claim against those Defendants.

See Ellis v. Louisiana-

Pacific Corp., 699 F.3d 778, 786-87 (4th Cir. 2012) (this court
may

affirm

on

alternate

grounds).

We

dispense

with

oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

3