Richard Tucker v. Russell Helbig

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:13-cv-00401-RMG. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999338964]. Mailed to: Richard Tucker. [13-7981]

Download PDF
Appeal: 13-7981 Doc: 9 Filed: 04/18/2014 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-7981 RICHARD PRICE TUCKER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CHAPLAIN RUSSELL HELBIG, sued in his personal-individual capacity and in his official capacity for injunctive relief, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Richard M. Gergel, District Judge. (8:13-cv-00401-RMG) Submitted: April 9, 2014 Decided: April 18, 2014 Before NIEMEYER and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Richard Price Tucker, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 13-7981 Doc: 9 Filed: 04/18/2014 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Richard Price Tucker appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), based on his failure to properly exhaust administrative remedies. error. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Tucker v. Helbig, No. 8:13-cv-00401-RMG (D.S.C. Dec. 4, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?