Richard Tucker v. Russell Helbig

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:13-cv-00401-RMG. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999338964]. Mailed to: Richard Tucker. [13-7981]

Appeal: 13-7981

Doc: 9

Filed: 04/18/2014

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-7981

RICHARD PRICE TUCKER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CHAPLAIN RUSSELL HELBIG, sued in his personal-individual
capacity and in his official capacity for injunctive relief,
Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Anderson. Richard M. Gergel, District Judge.
(8:13-cv-00401-RMG)

Submitted:

April 9, 2014

Decided:

April 18, 2014

Before NIEMEYER and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Richard Price Tucker, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens,
Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 13-7981

Doc: 9

Filed: 04/18/2014

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Richard

Price

Tucker

appeals

the

district

court’s

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six
Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388
(1971), based on his failure to properly exhaust administrative
remedies.
error.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court.

See Tucker v. Helbig, No. 8:13-cv-00401-RMG

(D.S.C. Dec. 4, 2013).

We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials

before

this

court

and

argument

would

not

aid

the

decisional process.
AFFIRMED

2