Terry Bender v. Anne Carter

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999275359-2] Originating case number: 5:12-cv-00165-FPS-JES Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999327132]. Mailed to: Bender. [13-8007]

Download PDF
Appeal: 13-8007 Doc: 9 Filed: 04/01/2014 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-8007 TERRY J. BENDER, Petitioner - Appellant, v. ANNE CARTER, Warden, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:12-cv-00165-FPS-JES) Submitted: March 27, 2014 Before MOTZ, Circuit Circuit Judges. Judge, Decided: and HAMILTON and April 1, 2014 DAVIS, Senior Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Terry J. Bender, Appellant Pro Se. Helen Campbell Altmeyer, Jarod James Douglas, Assistant United States Attorneys, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 13-8007 Doc: 9 Filed: 04/01/2014 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Terry J. Bender, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s orders adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition and denying his motion to alter or amend the judgment. error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, court. Va. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible we affirm for the reasons stated by the district See Bender v. Carter, No. 5:12-cv-00165-FPS-JES (N.D.W. Apr. 30, 2013; Oct. 15, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?