US v. Vincent Jennell, Jr.
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 7:02-cr-00032-JCT-3 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999366792]. Mailed to: Vincent Jennell, Jr.. [13-8047]
Appeal: 13-8047
Doc: 14
Filed: 06/02/2014
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-8047
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
VINCENT JENNELL, JR.,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke.
James C. Turk, Senior
District Judge. (7:02-cr-00032-JCT-3)
Submitted:
May 29, 2014
Decided:
June 2, 2014
Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Vincent Jennell, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Donald Ray Wolthuis,
Assistant
United
States
Attorney,
Roanoke,
Virginia,
for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 13-8047
Doc: 14
Filed: 06/02/2014
Pg: 2 of 2
Jennell,
appeals
PER CURIAM:
Vincent
Jr.,
the
district
court’s
order denying his motion to compel the Government to file a
motion for a sentence reduction under Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(b).
We
have
reviewed
the
record
and
find
no
reversible
error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court.
United States v. Jennell, No. 7:02-cr-00032-JCT-3 (W.D.
Va. Dec. 12, 2013).
facts
and
materials
legal
before
We dispense with oral argument because the
contentions
are
adequately
this
and
argument
court
presented
would
not
in
the
aid
the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?