US v. Bruce Richardson

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:06-cr-00010-MR-1. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999327300]. Mailed to: Bruce Richardson. [13-8050]

Download PDF
Appeal: 13-8050 Doc: 6 Filed: 04/01/2014 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-8050 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. BRUCE LEE RICHARDSON, a/k/a Chino, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Bryson City. Martin K. Reidinger, District Judge. (2:06-cr-00010-MR-1) Submitted: March 27, 2014 Before MOTZ, Circuit Circuit Judges. Judge, Decided: and HAMILTON and April 1, 2014 DAVIS, Senior Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Bruce Lee Richardson, Appellant Pro Se. Donald David Gast, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 13-8050 Doc: 6 Filed: 04/01/2014 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Bruce orders Lee denying his Richardson motion have appeals compel to the and the his record court’s motion and for reconsideration. We reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. reviewed district find See United States v. Richardson, No. 2:06-cr-00010-MR-1 (W.D.N.C. June 11, 2013; Dec. 2, 2013). dispense with contentions are oral no argument adequately because presented in the the facts We and legal materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?