US v. Bruce Richardson
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:06-cr-00010-MR-1. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999327300]. Mailed to: Bruce Richardson. [13-8050]
Appeal: 13-8050
Doc: 6
Filed: 04/01/2014
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-8050
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
BRUCE LEE RICHARDSON, a/k/a Chino,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Bryson City.
Martin K.
Reidinger, District Judge. (2:06-cr-00010-MR-1)
Submitted:
March 27, 2014
Before MOTZ, Circuit
Circuit Judges.
Judge,
Decided:
and
HAMILTON
and
April 1, 2014
DAVIS,
Senior
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Bruce Lee Richardson, Appellant Pro Se.
Donald David Gast,
Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 13-8050
Doc: 6
Filed: 04/01/2014
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Bruce
orders
Lee
denying
his
Richardson
motion
have
appeals
compel
to
the
and
the
his
record
court’s
motion
and
for
reconsideration.
We
reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court.
reviewed
district
find
See United States v. Richardson, No.
2:06-cr-00010-MR-1 (W.D.N.C. June 11, 2013; Dec. 2, 2013).
dispense
with
contentions
are
oral
no
argument
adequately
because
presented
in
the
the
facts
We
and
legal
materials
before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?