Andrea Weathers v. Univ of NC at Chapel Hill
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:12-cv-01059-TDS-JEP. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999399939]. [14-1044]
Appeal: 14-1044
Doc: 24
Filed: 07/22/2014
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1044
ANDREA C. WEATHERS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL; HERBERT B.
PETERSON, in his individual and official capacity; JONATHAN
KOTCH, in his individual and official capacity; BARBARA K.
RIMER, in her individual and official capacity; EDWARD M.
FOSTER, in his individual and official capacity; SANDRA L.
MARTIN, in her individual and official capacity,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Thomas D. Schroeder,
District Judge. (1:12-cv-01059-TDS-JEP)
Submitted:
June 30, 2014
Decided:
July 22, 2014
Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Andrea C. Weathers, Appellant Pro Se.
Matthew Thomas Tulchin,
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina,
for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 14-1044
Doc: 24
Filed: 07/22/2014
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Andrea C. Weathers appeals the district court’s order
granting Defendants’ motion to dismiss her action for relief
under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(d)(1), (3).
reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
we
affirm
for
the
reasons
stated
by
the
We have
Accordingly,
district
court.
Weathers v. Univ. of N.C., No. 1:12-cv-01059-TDS-JEP (M.D.N.C.
Sept. 30, 2013).
facts
and
materials
legal
before
We dispense with oral argument because the
contentions
are
adequately
this
and
argument
Court
presented
would
not
in
the
aid
the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?