In re: Benito H. Hernandez
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999289216-2]; denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [999289213-2] Originating case number: 1:10-cr-00023-MR-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999373889]. Mailed to: Benito Hernandez. [14-1091]
Appeal: 14-1091
Doc: 8
Filed: 06/11/2014
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1091
In Re:
BENITO HERNANDEZ HERNANDEZ,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
(1:10-cr-00023-MR-1)
Submitted:
May 30, 2014
Decided:
June 11, 2014
Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Benito Hernandez Hernandez, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 14-1091
Doc: 8
Filed: 06/11/2014
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Benito
Hernandez
Hernandez
petitions
for
a
writ
of
mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting
on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion.
He seeks an order from
this court directing the district court to act.
the
district
ruled
on
because
his
the
court’s
docket
reveals
that
§ 2255
motion
on
23,
court
has
district
May
recently
the
in
forma
pauperis.
We
dispense
district
2014.
court
Accordingly,
decided
case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot.
proceed
Our review of
Hernandez’s
We grant leave to
with
oral
argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?