In re: Benito H. Hernandez

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999289216-2]; denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [999289213-2] Originating case number: 1:10-cr-00023-MR-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999373889]. Mailed to: Benito Hernandez. [14-1091]

Download PDF
Appeal: 14-1091 Doc: 8 Filed: 06/11/2014 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1091 In Re: BENITO HERNANDEZ HERNANDEZ, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (1:10-cr-00023-MR-1) Submitted: May 30, 2014 Decided: June 11, 2014 Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Benito Hernandez Hernandez, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 14-1091 Doc: 8 Filed: 06/11/2014 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Benito Hernandez Hernandez petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. the district ruled on because his the court’s docket reveals that § 2255 motion on 23, court has district May recently the in forma pauperis. We dispense district 2014. court Accordingly, decided case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. proceed Our review of Hernandez’s We grant leave to with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?