Kathleen Kicinski v. North Carolina A & T State

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:11-cv-00351-CCE-LPA Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999430211].. [14-1111]

Download PDF
Appeal: 14-1111 Doc: 21 Filed: 09/05/2014 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1111 KATHLEEN KICINSKI, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. NORTH CAROLINA A & T STATE UNIVERSITY, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Catherine C. Eagles, District Judge. (1:11-cv-00351-CCE-LPA) Submitted: August 29, 2014 Decided: September 5, 2014 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Nancy Pulliam Quinn, THE QUINN LAW FIRM, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellant. Roy Cooper, North Carolina Attorney General, Gary R. Govert, Assistant Solicitor General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 14-1111 Doc: 21 Filed: 09/05/2014 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Kathleen North Carolina A Kicinski, & T a former University employee of (“University”), Defendant appeals the district court’s order granting the University’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(c) motion for judgment on the pleadings in her employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the district court’s ruling de novo, see Butler v. United States, 702 F.3d 749, 75152 (4th Cir. 2012) (setting forth standard of review), cert. denied, 133 S. Ct. 2398 (2013), in conjunction with the relevant record and the parties’ briefs, and discern no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See Kicinski v. N.C. A & T State Univ., No. 1:11-cv-00351-CCE-LPA (M.D.N.C. Jan. 6, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?