Kathleen Kicinski v. North Carolina A & T State
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:11-cv-00351-CCE-LPA Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999430211].. [14-1111]
Appeal: 14-1111
Doc: 21
Filed: 09/05/2014
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1111
KATHLEEN KICINSKI,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
NORTH CAROLINA A & T STATE UNIVERSITY,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Catherine C. Eagles,
District Judge. (1:11-cv-00351-CCE-LPA)
Submitted:
August 29, 2014
Decided:
September 5, 2014
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Nancy Pulliam Quinn, THE QUINN LAW FIRM, Greensboro, North
Carolina, for Appellant.
Roy Cooper, North Carolina Attorney
General, Gary R. Govert, Assistant Solicitor General, Raleigh,
North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 14-1111
Doc: 21
Filed: 09/05/2014
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Kathleen
North
Carolina
A
Kicinski,
&
T
a
former
University
employee
of
(“University”),
Defendant
appeals
the
district court’s order granting the University’s Fed. R. Civ. P.
12(c) motion for judgment on the pleadings in her employment
discrimination action.
We have reviewed the district court’s
ruling de novo, see Butler v. United States, 702 F.3d 749, 75152 (4th Cir. 2012) (setting forth standard of review), cert.
denied, 133 S. Ct. 2398 (2013), in conjunction with the relevant
record and the parties’ briefs, and discern no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order.
See Kicinski
v. N.C. A & T State Univ., No. 1:11-cv-00351-CCE-LPA (M.D.N.C.
Jan. 6, 2014).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before
this
court
and
argument
would
not
aid
the
decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?