Leon Ratliff v. Wake Forest Baptist Med Center

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999293934-2]. Originating case number: 1:13-cv-00991-CCE-LPA. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999345704]. Mailed to: Leon Ratliff. [14-1117]

Download PDF
Appeal: 14-1117 Doc: 14 Filed: 04/29/2014 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1117 LEON RATLIFF, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. WAKE FOREST BAPTIST MEDICAL CENTER, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Catherine C. Eagles, District Judge. (1:13-cv-00991-CCE-LPA) Submitted: April 24, 2014 Decided: April 29, 2014 Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Leon Ratliff, Appellant Pro se. William Randolph Loftis, Jr., William J. McMahon, IV, Kristine Marie Sims, CONSTANGY, BROOKS & SMITH, LLC, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 14-1117 Doc: 14 Filed: 04/29/2014 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Leon accepting the Ratliff appeals recommendation the of district the court’s magistrate order judge and dismissing Ratliff’s complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). error. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Ratliff v. 1:13-cv-00991-CCE-LPA Wake Forest (M.D.N.C. Jan. Baptist 28, Med. 2014). Ctr., We No. dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?