Leon Ratliff v. Wake Forest Baptist Med Center
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999293934-2]. Originating case number: 1:13-cv-00991-CCE-LPA. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999345704]. Mailed to: Leon Ratliff. [14-1117]
Appeal: 14-1117
Doc: 14
Filed: 04/29/2014
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1117
LEON RATLIFF,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
WAKE FOREST BAPTIST MEDICAL CENTER,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Catherine C. Eagles,
District Judge. (1:13-cv-00991-CCE-LPA)
Submitted:
April 24, 2014
Decided:
April 29, 2014
Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Leon Ratliff, Appellant Pro se. William Randolph Loftis, Jr.,
William J. McMahon, IV, Kristine Marie Sims, CONSTANGY, BROOKS &
SMITH, LLC, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 14-1117
Doc: 14
Filed: 04/29/2014
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Leon
accepting
the
Ratliff
appeals
recommendation
the
of
district
the
court’s
magistrate
order
judge
and
dismissing Ratliff’s complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)
(2012).
error.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis
and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district
court.
Ratliff
v.
1:13-cv-00991-CCE-LPA
Wake
Forest
(M.D.N.C.
Jan.
Baptist
28,
Med.
2014).
Ctr.,
We
No.
dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately
presented
in
the
materials
before
this
court
and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?