Thomas A. Murray v. Accomack County Health Dept
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999299581-2]; denying Motion to remand case [999337928-2] Originating case number: 2:13-cv-00206-AWA-TEM Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999366754]. Mailed to: Murray. [14-1134]
Appeal: 14-1134
Doc: 12
Filed: 06/02/2014
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1134
THOMAS A. MURRAY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ACCOMACK COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT, Director,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk.
Arenda L. Wright Allen,
District Judge. (2:13-cv-00206-AWA-TEM)
Submitted:
May 29, 2014
Decided:
June 2, 2014
Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Thomas A. Murray, Appellant Pro Se.
Erin Rose McNeill,
Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 14-1134
Doc: 12
Filed: 06/02/2014
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Thomas A. Murray appeals the district court’s orders
dismissing his civil complaint.
find no reversible error.
We have reviewed the record and
Accordingly, although we grant Murray
leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny his motion to remand
and
affirm
for
the
reasons
stated
by
the
district
court.
Murray v. Accomack Cnty. Health Dep’t, No. 2:13-cv-00206-AWA-TEM
(E.D. Va. filed Sept. 19, 2013 & entered Sept. 20, 2013; filed
Dec. 10, 2013 & entered Dec. 11, 2013).
We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?