Thomas A. Murray v. Accomack County Health Dept

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999299581-2]; denying Motion to remand case [999337928-2] Originating case number: 2:13-cv-00206-AWA-TEM Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999366754]. Mailed to: Murray. [14-1134]

Download PDF
Appeal: 14-1134 Doc: 12 Filed: 06/02/2014 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1134 THOMAS A. MURRAY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ACCOMACK COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT, Director, Defendant – Appellee, and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Arenda L. Wright Allen, District Judge. (2:13-cv-00206-AWA-TEM) Submitted: May 29, 2014 Decided: June 2, 2014 Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Thomas A. Murray, Appellant Pro Se. Erin Rose McNeill, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 14-1134 Doc: 12 Filed: 06/02/2014 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Thomas A. Murray appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his civil complaint. find no reversible error. We have reviewed the record and Accordingly, although we grant Murray leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny his motion to remand and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Murray v. Accomack Cnty. Health Dep’t, No. 2:13-cv-00206-AWA-TEM (E.D. Va. filed Sept. 19, 2013 & entered Sept. 20, 2013; filed Dec. 10, 2013 & entered Dec. 11, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?