Bryant Moore v. Lightstorm Entertainment, Inc.

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:11-cv-03644-RWT Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999487825].. [14-1135]

Appeal: 14-1135

Doc: 54

Filed: 12/05/2014

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-1135

BRYANT MOORE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
LIGHTSTORM ENTERTAINMENT, INC.;
CENTURY FOX FILM CORPORATION,

JAMES

CAMERON;

TWENTIETH

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, Senior District Judge.
(8:11-cv-03644-RWT)

Submitted:

November 26, 2014

Before KING and
Circuit Judge.

THACKER,

Circuit

Decided:

Judges,

December 5, 2014

and

DAVIS,

Senior

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bruce S. Rogow, Tara A. Campion, BRUCE S. ROGOW, PA, Fort
Lauderdale, Florida; Bradley A. Thomas, THE LAW OFFICE OF
BRADLEY A. THOMAS, Washington, D.C., for Appellant.
Robert H.
Rotstein, MITCHELL SILBERBERG & KNUPP LLP, Los Angeles,
California, J. Matthew Williams, MITCHELL SILBERBERG & KNUPP
LLP, Washington, D.C, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 14-1135

Doc: 54

Filed: 12/05/2014

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Bryant

Moore

appeals

the

district

court’s

order

granting summary judgment in favor of the Appellees on Moore’s
claims of copyright infringement.
and find no reversible error.

We have reviewed the record

Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court.

See generally Moore v.

Lightstorm Entm’t, Inc., 992 F. Supp. 2d 543 (D. Md. 2014).
dispense

with

contentions

are

oral

argument

adequately

because

presented

in

the
the

facts

We

and

legal

materials

before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2