Rafia Hamid v. Deutsche Bank National Trust

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:13-cv-01190-AJT-JFA,12-17150-BFK Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999386977]. Mailed to: Rafia Hamid. [14-1157]

Download PDF
Appeal: 14-1157 Doc: 13 Filed: 07/01/2014 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1157 In Re: RAFIA HAMID, Debtor. ---------------------RAFIA HAMID, Debtor - Appellant, v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST American Home Mortgage Assets Chapter 13 Trustee, COMPANY, as Trustee for Trust; THOMAS P. GORMAN, Trustees - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Anthony J. Trenga, District Judge. (1:13-cv-01190-AJT-JFA; 12-17150-BFK) Submitted: June 26, 2014 Decided: July 1, 2014 Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Rafia Hamid, Appellant Pro Se. Billy Bernard Ruhling, II, TROUTMAN SANDERS, LLP, Tysons Corner, Virginia; Thomas Patrick Appeal: 14-1157 Doc: 13 Filed: 07/01/2014 Pg: 2 of 3 Gorman, OFFICE OF THE CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 Appeal: 14-1157 Doc: 13 Filed: 07/01/2014 Pg: 3 of 3 PER CURIAM: Rafia Hamid appeals from the district court’s order dismissing as untimely her appeal from the bankruptcy court’s orders granting relief from the automatic stay, dismissing her adversary proceeding, and dismissing her bankruptcy case. district court dismissed Hamid’s appeal timely file a notice of appeal. Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. after she failed The to See Fed. R. Bankr. P. 8002; 205, 214 (2007) (“[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.”). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hamid v. Deutsche Bank Nat’l Trust, No. 1:13-cv-01190-AJT-JFA (E.D. Va. Jan. 28, 2014). facts and materials legal before We dispense with oral argument because the contentions are adequately this and argument court presented would not in the aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?