Rafia Hamid v. Deutsche Bank National Trust
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:13-cv-01190-AJT-JFA,12-17150-BFK Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999386977]. Mailed to: Rafia Hamid. [14-1157]
Appeal: 14-1157
Doc: 13
Filed: 07/01/2014
Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1157
In Re: RAFIA HAMID,
Debtor.
---------------------RAFIA HAMID,
Debtor - Appellant,
v.
DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST
American Home Mortgage Assets
Chapter 13 Trustee,
COMPANY, as Trustee for
Trust; THOMAS P. GORMAN,
Trustees - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria.
Anthony J. Trenga,
District Judge. (1:13-cv-01190-AJT-JFA; 12-17150-BFK)
Submitted:
June 26, 2014
Decided:
July 1, 2014
Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Rafia Hamid, Appellant Pro Se.
Billy Bernard Ruhling, II,
TROUTMAN SANDERS, LLP, Tysons Corner, Virginia; Thomas Patrick
Appeal: 14-1157
Doc: 13
Filed: 07/01/2014
Pg: 2 of 3
Gorman, OFFICE OF THE CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE, Alexandria, Virginia,
for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
Appeal: 14-1157
Doc: 13
Filed: 07/01/2014
Pg: 3 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Rafia Hamid appeals from the district court’s order
dismissing as untimely her appeal from the bankruptcy court’s
orders granting relief from the automatic stay, dismissing her
adversary proceeding, and dismissing her bankruptcy case.
district
court
dismissed
Hamid’s
appeal
timely file a notice of appeal.
Bowles
v.
Russell,
551
U.S.
after
she
failed
The
to
See Fed. R. Bankr. P. 8002;
205,
214
(2007)
(“[T]he
timely
filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional
requirement.”).
We have reviewed the record and the district
court’s order and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Hamid v.
Deutsche Bank Nat’l Trust, No. 1:13-cv-01190-AJT-JFA (E.D. Va.
Jan. 28, 2014).
facts
and
materials
legal
before
We dispense with oral argument because the
contentions
are
adequately
this
and
argument
court
presented
would
not
in
the
aid
the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?