Debbie Washington v. Patrick Donahoe
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:13-cv-00339-DKC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999366675]. Mailed to: Debbie Washington. [14-1162]
Appeal: 14-1162
Doc: 22
Filed: 06/02/2014
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1162
DEBBIE WASHINGTON,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
PATRICK R. DONAHOE, Postmaster General for the United
States Postal Service Capital Metro Area; PRINCE JONES;
ANNETTA
WALLACE,
Retired;
IDA
STRUGELL;
TONI
GRIER,
Retired; FRANCES C. LAMER; JENNIFER GREEN; ROCHELL TALLEY;
WILLIAMS JACOB; WILLIAM MOONEY; U.S. POSTAL SERVICE,
Postmaster General; ROBERT HARNEST, NALC 142 Branch;
ELLEN S. SALTZMAN, Arbitrator; TIMOTHY W. DOWDY, National
Business Agent; ROBERT WILLIAMS, NALC-142; ALTON BRANSON,
NALC 142; NIGEL MCCLEAN,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Deborah K. Chasanow, Chief District
Judge. (8:13-cv-00339-DKC)
Submitted:
May 29, 2014
Decided:
June 2, 2014
Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Debbie Washington, Appellant Pro Se. Larry David Adams,
Assistant United States Attorney, Nathaniel Cohen, OFFICE OF THE
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 14-1162
Doc: 22
Filed: 06/02/2014
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Debbie Washington appeals the district court’s orders
denying relief on her complaint and denying reconsideration.
have
reviewed
the
record
and
find
no
reversible
We
error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court.
Washington v. Donahoe, No. 8:13-cv-00339-DKC (D. Md.
Feb. 4, 2014).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before
this
court
and
argument
would
not
aid
the
decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?